After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures across Europe, fresh technologies have become reviving these kinds of systems. Out of lie recognition tools tested at the border to a system for confirming documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of technology is being utilized for asylum applications. This article is exploring how these technology have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. That reveals just how asylum seekers are transformed into required hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series read review of techno-bureaucratic steps and to keep up with capricious tiny within criteria and deadlines. This obstructs their very own capacity to navigate these devices and to pursue their right for security.
It also shows how these types of technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They facilitate the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity simply by hindering these people from being able to view the channels of coverage. It further states that examines of securitization and victimization should be combined with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms these technologies, by which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects who are self-disciplined by their reliability on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article argues that these technologies have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double result: even though they assist to expedite the asylum method, they also generate it difficult with regards to refugees to navigate these systems. They are really positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes all of them vulnerable to bogus decisions created by non-governmental celebrities, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their cases. Moreover, they will pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.